RDI
Menu
Start with RDIAssess maturity

RDI workflow

Weighbridge & Tipping Truck Workflow Monitoring

Currently, the evidence system does not have a native integration with weighbridge systems. The workflow represents a product development opportunity: integrating the evidence system's Gate Report ANPR with weighbridge data to automatically cross-reference truck identity, load weight, and tipping event against claimed tonnage.

Category
Specialist Capture & Emerging Technology
Frequency
Rare
Confidence
Low
Evidence records
2
Cost model
Qualitative

Trigger, activity, conclusion

01 · Trigger

A bulk earthworks or demolition project is underway where a subcontractor is being paid on a per-load or per-tonne basis and the main contractor needs to verify claimed loads.

02 · Activity

Cross-referencing camera-recorded truck arrival and departure events with weighbridge system records to verify that every claimed load is supported by a corresponding truck movement and valid weigh ticket.

03 · Conclusion

A reconciled load count and tonnage record produced, confirming or identifying a discrepancy. Used to approve, adjust, or dispute the subcontractor's payment application.

Workflow steps

  1. Step 01

    Bulk earthworks or demolition subcontract awarded on a per-load or per-tonne payment basis.

    Inferred
  2. Step 02

    [Aspirational] the evidence system's Gate Report configured to capture all truck plate numbers and timestamps at the site gate.

    Inferred
  3. Step 03

    [Aspirational] Weighbridge system records gross, tare, and net weight for each truck on each trip.

    Inferred
  4. Step 04

    [Aspirational] Gate Report vehicle movement data exported and cross-referenced against the weighbridge weigh ticket log — matching plate numbers and timestamps.

    Inferred
  5. Step 05

    Discrepancies identified: trucks in Gate Report without a corresponding weigh ticket, anomalously low net weights, or ticket sequences that do not match observed trip counts.

    Inferred
  6. Step 06

    Camera footage at the tipping or loading area reviewed for flagged truck events to visually confirm whether a full tipping event occurred.

    Inferred
  7. Step 07

    Reconciliation report produced — confirmed loads, flagged discrepancies, adjusted tonnage total — presented to the subcontractor with supporting evidence.

    Inferred
  8. Step 08

    Subcontractor's payment application approved at the reconciled tonnage figure; overpayment recovered or deducted from the next application.

    Inferred

Evidence records

Weighbridge integration aspiration documented — a desired workflow in which the evidence system cameras and weighbridge systems are integrated to verify truck loads — confirming this as a tracked feature development opportunity with a clear commercial use case in bulk earthworks projects.
Anonymized evidence record 54.1
the evidence system's Gate Report ANPR capability already provides the vehicle identification and timestamp layer that forms the basis of this workflow; the gap is the weighbridge data integration, not the camera infrastructure.
Anonymized evidence record 54.2
Per-tonne and per-load payment structures are standard on civil earthworks and demolition subcontracts; over-claiming on truck loads is a well-documented industry problem that automated camera-weighbridge reconciliation would directly address.
Anonymized evidence record 54.3

ROI model

Qualitative workflow

This workflow is currently represented as a qualitative benefit. A parametric cost model should be added only when the assumption set is credible.