RDI workflow
Union / Labour Compliance & Workforce Verification
cloud recordings and live camera feeds provide timestamped visual evidence of workforce composition, headcount, and on-site activity patterns — supporting union compliance verification.
- Category
- Subcontractor & Labour Management
- Frequency
- Rare
- Confidence
- Low
- Evidence records
- 3
- Cost model
- Qualitative
Trigger, activity, conclusion
A union compliance obligation, contractual workforce requirement, or production rate discrepancy prompts a review of on-site labour composition.
Using camera footage and Gate Report data to verify that the workforce on site matches the agreed labour classifications, crew sizes, and production rates.
Workforce composition confirmed as compliant, or discrepancy identified, documented, and escalated.
Workflow steps
- Step 01
A union compliance obligation, contractual workforce requirement, or production rate discrepancy prompts a review of on-site labour composition.
Inferred - Step 02
Labour relations manager, site manager, or QS identifies the relevant time period and site areas to be reviewed.
Evidenced - Step 03
cloud recordings accessed and the relevant time windows selected.
Evidenced - Step 04
Gate Report (ANPR) data cross-referenced with camera footage to reconcile vehicle entries with claimed crew sizes on certified payroll records.
Inferred - Step 05
Footage reviewed to observe crew composition — mix of trades present, any non-union workers on a union-mandated site.
Evidenced - Step 06
Production rate benchmarking conducted where applicable — comparing observed output rates against rates claimed by the subcontractor.
Evidenced - Step 07
Where a discrepancy found, relevant clips exported with timestamps and provided to the labour relations team or union representative.
Inferred - Step 08
Formal report or grievance response prepared, citing footage as corroborating evidence.
Inferred - Step 09
Compliance matter resolved — corrective action by the subcontractor, adjusted payment, or formal grievance outcome.
Inferred
Evidence records
Verifying workforce composition and union compliance through camera evidence — confirming the core workflow as a documented use case with distinct characteristics from general attendance monitoring.
Camera footage used for production rate benchmarking — verifying that claimed productivity levels match observed output — establishing the more sophisticated compliance verification variant of this workflow.
Paul was able to use the Recordings tab to verify when his concrete sub got to site and when they left. He needed to verify that they worked 12 hours.
ROI model
Qualitative workflow
This workflow is currently represented as a qualitative benefit. A parametric cost model should be added only when the assumption set is credible.