RDI workflow
Regulatory / OSHA / HSE Investigation Support
the evidence system cloud and local high-frame-rate recordings retrieved, preserved, and disclosed in response to formal statutory safety regulator investigation requests.
- Category
- Compliance & Regulatory
- Frequency
- Common
- Confidence
- High
- Evidence records
- 15
- Cost model
- Qualitative
Trigger, activity, conclusion
Statutory safety regulator formally notifies contractor of investigation following a reportable accident, dangerous occurrence, or specified near-miss.
Preserving, reviewing, and formally disclosing preserved footage to the regulatory investigator.
Regulatory investigation concludes. preserved footage supports contractor's defence or informs remediation plan.
Workflow steps
- Step 01
Reportable incident occurs on site.
Inferred - Step 02
Contractor complies with immediate statutory notification obligation.
Inferred - Step 03
Upon notification receipt, contractor's safety manager/legal counsel instructs the evidence system to preserve footage.
Evidenced - Step 04
Regulatory investigator requests disclosure of all relevant evidence.
Evidenced - Step 05
Contractor's legal counsel reviews preserved footage before disclosure.
Evidenced - Step 06
Relevant footage extracted and compiled into structured evidence package.
Evidenced - Step 07
Evidence package disclosed to investigator in specified format and timescale.
Inferred - Step 08
Regulatory investigator reviews footage alongside other evidence.
Evidenced - Step 09
Contractor prepares formal written response referencing footage evidence.
Inferred - Step 10
Investigation concludes with formal decision and contractor implements any remediation.
Inferred - Step 11
All footage, correspondence, and legal advice archived under privilege.
Inferred
Evidence records
Regulatory investigation initiated following a reportable workplace incident — preserved footage retrieved, preserved, and formally disclosed to the statutory investigator as part of the contractor's evidence submission; footage provided the timestamped visual record of the incident sequence and the pre-incident working conditions.
An anonymized contractor used video footage from the evidence system to investigate a workers' comp claim — saved An anonymized contractor $35k of direct costs. Footage showed the worker had placed a ladder in a puddle without a spotter, a clear safety protocol violation.
A worker was found on the ground. The client has requested assistance in reviewing available camera footage to better understand the timeline of events. Please preserve all available footage.
ROI model
risk reduction
Low-probability, high-consequence events whose expected cost is reduced by Evercam's monitoring, deterrence, or evidence capability. Calculated as expected value (probability × cost). Presented separately from operational savings in the output document under 'Risk Mitigation Value'.
annual_risk_without = event_probability × event_cost; annual_risk_with = (event_probability × (1 - probability_reduction_pct)) × (event_cost × (1 - cost_mitigation_pct)); saving = (annual_risk_without - annual_risk_with) × (project_duration_months / 12)