RDI workflow
Dispute Resolution — Legal Evidence Retrieval & Formal Claims
When a construction dispute escalates to formal legal proceedings, preserved footage is retrieved, preserved, and packaged as formal evidence. Support teams assist with high-resolution local recording extraction and chain-of-custody documentation.
- Category
- Claims, Disputes & Legal Evidence
- Frequency
- Very Common
- Confidence
- High
- Evidence records
- 25
- Cost model
- Qualitative
Trigger, activity, conclusion
A construction dispute fails to resolve through negotiation and escalates to formal legal or adjudication proceedings. Legal counsel is engaged and a formal evidence package must be assembled.
Retrieving, preserving, and formally packaging preserved footage and associated metadata as admissible evidence for use in legal proceedings.
A formally preserved and authenticated footage package is delivered to the legal team or adjudicator. Footage either resolves the proceeding or forms the cornerstone of the evidence bundle.
Workflow steps
- Step 01
A dispute that has not resolved through negotiation or mediation is formally escalated — legal proceedings commenced, or a formal insurance claim requiring legal support is filed.
Inferred - Step 02
Legal counsel or claims consultant identifies that preserved footage from the relevant time period is potentially material evidence and issues a formal evidence preservation request.
Evidenced - Step 03
the evidence system support team notified of the legal hold requirement — footage for the relevant cameras, time windows, and dates flagged for preservation and protected from overwrite.
Evidenced - Step 04
Relevant footage identified: cloud recordings accessed for standard time windows; local recording extraction requested for extended periods or higher-resolution requirements.
Evidenced - Step 05
the evidence system support extracts the local high-frame-rate recordings and provides them in a format suitable for legal review.
Evidenced - Step 06
Footage reviewed by the legal team and the client — key clips identified and indexed by event, timestamp, and relevance to the claim.
Inferred - Step 07
Chain-of-custody record established — documenting who accessed, extracted, and handled the footage and when.
Inferred - Step 08
Where footage authenticity may be challenged, the evidence system may be asked to provide a technical witness statement confirming the recording system's integrity and timestamp accuracy.
Inferred - Step 09
Footage evidence package formally disclosed to the opposing party's legal representatives in accordance with applicable disclosure rules.
Inferred - Step 10
Footage presented at adjudication, arbitration, or trial — either resolving the matter or forming part of the evidence bundle.
Inferred - Step 11
Proceedings conclude. Footage archive retained for the applicable statutory period.
Inferred
Evidence records
preserved footage was formally disclosed as part of the evidence bundle in a formal adjudication proceeding — the adjudicator referenced the footage in their decision, finding in favour of the main contractor on a disputed variation claim.
Trevor brought the subby into his office and showed him a video of what happened (on the evidence system), after which he returned the €70k. Trevor explained that if the video was not produced, the subby was willing to go to court.
Insurer's legal team formally requested preserved footage extraction with chain-of-custody documentation for use in a £200k+ property damage subrogation claim — the evidence system support assisted with local recording extraction and provided a technical confirmation letter.
ROI model
dispute claims
Evercam provides visual evidence that resolves or prevents disputes with subcontractors, suppliers, and clients. Saving from faster resolution, avoided escalation, and prevented overcharges.
saving = (disputes_avoided_pct × disputes_per_year × avg_resolution_cost) + (overcharges_prevented_per_year × avg_overcharge_value)